Introduction

Website Name: USDA Farm Subsidy Fraud
URL: www.usdafarmsubsidyfraud.info
URL (to identify WordPress site): www.usdafarmsubsidyfraud.info/farm

   I am setting up my website as a public service for the USA public so they can be informed about USDA’s resolution of my complaint concerning farm subsidies for Hutterite colonies. My website is also for judicial review.
   From my research on the Internet, I know there are over 150 Hutterite colonies receiving farm subsidies. I also know Hutterite colonies are operating with the IRS tax-exempt classification 501(d) Apostolic and religious organization. So, Hutterite colonies are operating as a tax-exempt nonprofit religious organization.
   I filed a complaint with USDA in Washington, DC. I filed my complaint with Ed Schafer, Secretary of Agriculture under the Bush Administration, and Tom Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture under the Obama Administration, and USDA’s Farm Service Agency (FSA).
   I made the case for the termination of farm subsidies for Hutterite colonies and a revision of the farm subsidy program eligibility requirements so a tax-exempt nonprofit [religious] organization would not be eligible for farm subsidies.
   I received 2 statements from John Johnson, Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs, dated 9/5/2008 and 10/14/2008, and a e-mail from Candace Thompson, Acting Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs, dated 3/4/2009, as USDA’s resolution of my complaint.
   To make a long story short, USDA failed to correct the problem of farm subsidies for Hutterite colonies and established a position of supporting farm subsidies for a nonprofit religious organization.
   I sent my complaint to the House Committee on Agriculture on 7/21/2009. I requested a statement from the committee concerning their resolution of my complaint.
   From my research of the Farm Bill, I discovered the source of the problem of farm subsidies for a tax-exempt nonprofit [religious] organization. The source of the problem is the Farm Bill’s definition of a Producer as,

“an owner, operator, landlord, tenant, or sharecropper that shares in the risk of producing a crop and is entitled to share in the crop available for marketing from the farm, or would have shared had the crop been produced.”

   As of September 2012 the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry, has passed its version of the Farm Bill 2012 known as S. 3240, and the House Committee on Agriculture has passed its version of the Farm Bill 2012 known as H.R. 6083. The definition of a Producer found in both the Senate and House versions of the Farm Bill 2012 is the same as the definition of a Producer found in the House version of the Farm Bill 2007 known as H.R. 2419.
   From all of the Farm Bill 2012 text material I have reviewed, I have not found a solution to the problem of farm subsidies for a tax-exempt nonprofit [religious] organization.
   You can find the Farm Bill 2012 text material at these websites:
1) Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry
       Website: www.ag.senate.gov
       Webpage: http://www.ag.senate.gov/issues/farm-bill
2) House Committee on Agriculture
       Website: www.agriculture.house.gov
       Webpage: http://agriculture.house.gov/farmbill

   I sent different complaints to the House Committee on Rules (2009) and the Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs (2010). I requested a statement from the committees concerning their resolution of my complaint.
   As of 10/1/2012 I have not received a statement from the House Committee on Agriculture, House Committee on Rules, or the Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs, concerning their resolution of my complaint.
   You can find a copy of my complaint for the House Committee on Agriculture at the link:
10, Complaint, House Committee on Agriculture, 2009
   You can find a copy of my complaint for the House Committee on Rules at the link:
11, Complaint, House Committee on Rules, 2009
   You can find a copy of my complaint for the Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs at the link:
12, Complaint, Senate Committee on Homeland Security, 2010
   You can find US Postal Service information for the complaints I sent to the 3 USA Government committees at the link:
13, US Postal Service info for Complaints
   My complaints are valid complaints and deal with violations of the law or operating procedure. The failure of the 3 USA Government committees to send a statement to me within a 2-3 year time period leads to a finding of a flawed USA Government committee system. System errors are a problem that needs a solution.
   The documentation on my website up to the link ‘Calling Cybersleuths’ is set up as a series of steps for a court case. You will find documentation for over 150 Hutterite colonies, and over 25 farms that may be a Hutterite colony, as USDA farm subsidy recipients, including IRS tax classification data. The evidence will establish that farm subsidies for Hutterite colonies equals fraud. You can help bring the perpetrators of USDA farm subsidy fraud to justice by checking the link ‘Calling Cybersleuths’. You will find documentation for organizations to investigate for USDA farm subsidy fraud.
   As a guide to my website, after reading the Homepage I recommend starting with the Text and then proceeding through the Evidence. The Evidence includes these sections and material:
  1) Introduction to Hutterite’s USDA farm subsidies Complaint
  2) Farm Bill 2007, 2012
  3) Summary of Objections to Hutterite’s USDA farm subsidies
  4) Overview of Evidence for Hutterite Colonies as USDA farm subsidy recipients
  5) Documentation as evidence
         a) Documentation for over 150 Hutterite colonies as USDA farm subsidy
             recipients (Master Set 1)
         b) Documentation for over 25 farms, that may be a Hutterite colony, as
             USDA farm subsidy recipients (Master Set 2)
  6) Resource Material to support a court case. This type of documentation can be
      found in various sections of material.

   After the Evidence you can proceed to ‘USDA Court Cases’, ‘Calling Cybersleuths’, ‘Contact’, ‘Database’, ‘My Case’, and ‘Updates’.
   The plaintiffs in the USDA court cases are Pigford, Keepseagle, Love, and Garcia. The court cases allege racial and gender discrimination in USDA’s farm loan program. The documentation includes court case material.
   ‘Calling Cybersleuths’ includes documentation for cybersleuths and the public for investigating organizations for fraudulent claims for USDA farm subsidies. The section also includes material to start a tour of the world’s farm subsidy programs to investigate for fraudulent claims for farm subsidies.
   The ‘Database’ sets up a database of fraudulent claims for USDA farm subsidies starting with USDA farm subsidy recipients from my Master Lists for Hutterite Colonies (Master Set 1) and Farms (Master Set 2).
   If you discover fraudulent claims for USDA farm subsidies, recognized by the loss of a public benefit or zero public benefit, I will enter them into the database.
   If you decide to make a tour of the world’s farm subsidy programs and you discover fraudulent claims for farm subsidies you can notify FarmSubsidy.org at:
Website: www.farmsubsidy.org
E-mail: team@farmsubsidy.org